In previous articles I’ve discussed the advantages of aerial photography and shooting from a helicopter as opposed to shooting from a light plane. But are there any special considerations with regard to equipment when shooting from the air?
Since we’ve already established that it’s the superior choice (at least in my opinion), let’s concentrate on the helicopter first. An open door gives the photographer a vast range of angle options, and selecting the equipment can be difficult at first. You can find many good compositions with ultra-wide angles all the way to telephoto lenses.
From my personal experience, the majority of my shots were taken with the wider end of a 24-70mm lens, i.e. If you only take one camera body (and don’t plan to switch lenses on the helicopter), take either a 24-70 or an ultra-wide such as a 16-35. Remember that an ultra-wide might come in handy at times, but when a need for longer focal length comes, it might lack the reach.
Naturally, lens selection also depends on the subject: if you know you’ll be shooting grand landscapes, use a wider focal length. If you’re interested in capturing detail or if you’re limited in your ability to get close to the subject, use a longer lens.
|photography - part 3: equipment 1" border="0" height="368" src="http://1.img-dpreview.com/files/p/E~TS590x0~articles/1048839284/l_Sossusvlei_Aerials_11-3-2014_63v.jpeg" width="590" title="The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography - part 3: equipment 1">|
From high up, you don’t always need an ultra-wide lens to capture grand landscapes. This image was shot at 46mm.
I highly recommend taking 2 camera bodies to an aerial shoot. If you do that, you can use another lens without switching it in midair, which can be complicated, not to mention extremely dangerous in case it goes flying out of the open door or window. The extra lens can be an ultra-wide but I personally prefer a telephoto. With a longer lens you can really delve into the fine detail of your subject, which might be hidden when shooting from the ground, and capture unique perspectives and interesting compositions.
My favorite telephoto lens is the Canon 70-300mm F4-5.6L IS, and I found myself shooting on the long end of the zoom quite a bit. The main advantage for me is that even though you’re flying hundreds of meters above the landscape, you can really get close and intimate with it when using a long lens.
When shooting from a plane, my recommendation is a 24-70 and a telephoto. Anything wider will capture parts of the plane, such as a wing or an engine, most of the time, which renders it almost useless.
|photography - part 3: equipment 2" border="0" height="342" src="http://3.img-dpreview.com/files/p/E~TS590x0~articles/1048839284/l_Holuhraun_2014_143.jpeg" width="590" title="The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography - part 3: equipment 2">|
|At 176mm focal length, the Telephoto lens gave me a chance to capture the details on the erupting lava. Flying any closer was impossible since the air above the lava flow was so warm it made the helicopter tremble.
Once on the helicopter, you will most likely fasten the camera straps to a dedicated part in the seat belt. While this keeps the equipment from falling from the heli, you might finds straps getting tangled after going back and forth between camera bodies, which could in turn cause you to miss good shots. Try to be aware of this, and always make sure the straps are disentangled when time comes to shoot. The entanglement problem is also the reason that while it is possible to take 3 bodies, it’s not recommended.
|photography - part 3: equipment 3" border="0" height="394" src="http://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/E~TS590x0~articles/1048839284/l_Flight_2-8-2015_2.jpeg" width="590" title="The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography - part 3: equipment 3">|
|Space in a light plane can be tight, so often you’ll only use one body. I would use a 24-70mm in that case.
Forget about using square filters, or anything else that can fly off and hit one of the rotors. It might feel calm inside, but try to take your hand out of the cabin and you’ll feel the enormous wind strength out there. There’s no reason to risk your life, and with today’s high-DR cameras you can compensate for global contrast when post processing the image. A polarizer is also a bad idea, as it can substantially darken the image and require a slower shutter speed or higher ISO.
|photography - part 3: equipment 4" border="0" height="443" src="http://1.img-dpreview.com/files/p/E~TC4x3S590x0~articles/1048839284/l_Cessna_Flight_1-2-2016_63.jpeg" width="590" title="The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography - part 3: equipment 4">|
|Even high global contrast can be balanced with today’s high-DR sensors.
The Lofoten Islands,
One last thing to mention regarding gear is clothing. It can get cold up there, and while I was able to wear a t-shirt when shooting aerials in Namibia, in the Arctic I needed full thermal gear – the most important items were the hat and gloves. There were times my hands were totally devoid of all sensation and I had to stop shooting due to the cold. Be ready for this and try to use gloves that protect your hands from cold winds while allowing you to operate the camera.
In the next article in this series, I’ll talk about technique and parameters for aerial photography.
Erez Marom is a professional nature photographer, photography guide and traveler based in Israel. You can follow Erez’s work on Instagram, Facebook and 500px, and subscribe to his mailing list for updates.
If you’d like to experience and shoot some of the most fascinating landscapes on earth with Erez as your guide, you’re welcome to take a look at his unique photography workshops around the world:
Land of Ice – Southern Iceland
Winter Paradise – Northern Iceland
Northern Spirits – The Lofoten Islands
Giants of the Andes and Fitz Roy Hiking Annex – Patagonia
Tales of Arctic Nights – Greenland
Saga of the Seas and The Far Reaches Annex – The Faroe Islands
Desert Storm – Namibia
More in This Series:
- The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography – Part 1: Why shoot aerials?
- The good, the bad and the ugly of aerial photography – Part 2: Aircraft
Selected Articles by Erez Marom:
- Parallelism in Landscape photography
- Behind the Shot: Dark Matter
- Mountain Magic: Shooting in the Lofoten Islands
- Behind the Shot: Nautilus
- Behind the Shot: Lost in Space
- Behind the Shot: Spot the Shark
- Quick Look: The Art of the Unforeground
- Whatever it Doesn’t Take
- Winds of Change: Shooting changing landscapes
- On the Importance of Naming Images